Comments on: "Secular" Islam http://www.iqrasense.com/islam-and-media/secular-islam.html Islamic Blog - Muslim Blog to discuss Islamic and Arab and Middle Eastern topics and articles Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:29:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ana http://www.iqrasense.com/islam-and-media/secular-islam.html#comment-9673 Ana Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:38:53 +0000 http://www.iqrasense.com/islam-and-media/secular-islam.html#comment-9673 Assalamu Alaykum. Well I guess the declaration has obvious meaning to those muslims who now and understand their religion in the right order. Some reason that they quuoted out refering violation of human rights, I mean where does Islam sa that a woman is forced to marry some one she doesn't want. Or she should be circumcised or what eve they said. WHERE EXACTLY DID ISLAM PUT THAT FORWARD TO BE PRACTICED? Rather its the thing that some people in the muslim nation practice. Does all what the people inthe muslim nations do according to Islam? Thts the first question to be asked of. Rather the declaration should b based on how to eradicate some cultural , non-islamic practices. I don't like this kind of things which are done in the name of Islam that Islam says this and says that or whatever. THIS IS TOTALLY WRONG. Those people should know about Islam and differentiate b/n culturalpractices and ISLAM before they say something about it. Well I guess there should be knowledge of something before speaking of it . And when talking about things of we don't know, The Qur'an states it clearly that we abstain from such acts. And whatever they say Alhamdulillah we do our job according to the right ways. Assalamu Alaykum. Well I guess the declaration has obvious meaning to those muslims who now and understand their religion in the right order. Some reason that they quuoted out refering violation of human rights, I mean where does Islam sa that a woman is forced to marry some one she doesn’t want. Or she should be circumcised or what eve they said. WHERE EXACTLY DID ISLAM PUT THAT FORWARD TO BE PRACTICED? Rather its the thing that some people in the muslim nation practice. Does all what the people inthe muslim nations do according to Islam? Thts the first question to be asked of. Rather the declaration should b based on how to eradicate some cultural , non-islamic practices. I don’t like this kind of things which are done in the name of Islam that Islam says this and says that or whatever. THIS IS TOTALLY WRONG. Those people should know about Islam and differentiate b/n culturalpractices and ISLAM before they say something about it. Well I guess there should be knowledge of something before speaking of it . And when talking about things of we don’t know, The Qur’an states it clearly that we abstain from such acts.
And whatever they say Alhamdulillah we do our job according to the right ways.

]]> By: Maysoun http://www.iqrasense.com/islam-and-media/secular-islam.html#comment-1263 Maysoun Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:31:30 +0000 http://www.iqrasense.com/islam-and-media/secular-islam.html#comment-1263 Salam aleikum. Christian, yews buddhist , hindus all practist adultery.Al humdiallah iam a convert to Islam and iam proud of it. Salam Salam aleikum. Christian, yews buddhist , hindus all practist adultery.Al humdiallah iam a convert to Islam and iam proud of it. Salam

]]> By: Segiru Sule http://www.iqrasense.com/islam-and-media/secular-islam.html#comment-776 Segiru Sule Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:17:09 +0000 http://www.iqrasense.com/islam-and-media/secular-islam.html#comment-776 This type of declaration could only have come from those who are 'ashamed' of their faith. Or better still, those who are not even believers. Religious or spiritual matters are not 'subjectable' to scientific research or enquiry. So, the declarants of that so-called 'declaration' are not only ignorant but blatantly mischievious. In the first place, they (declarants) are a faceless bunch of strange bed-fellows. They call themselves, - BELIEVERS, DOUBTERS AND UNBELIEVERS. No right-thinking individual would take such a group of fellows seriously. It is better for them to take a stand. Let them move away from the centre of the road - it is too dangerious. They should either be (1) 'believers', (2) 'doubters' or (3) 'unbelievers'. They cannot belong to the three camps all at the same time. Because they are ambivalent, I am not going to take them seriously. However, let them known that Islam does not encourage/preach honour killing, forced veiling, forced marriage, oppression of women, female circumcission, etc, as alleged. Indeed, Islam practically defend and protect women in a special way. A sura(chapter) is devoted to women. Those who are interested should go a read it for themselves. (SURAT AN-NISA). They also talked about separation of religion from state. They betrayed their ignorance of the fact that religion gave rise to the state. The very foundation of 'the state' is anchored on religion, hence separating them 100% will be near impossible. The western attempt to do so is what has resulted in lesbianism and state sanctioned sodomy. Now, a man can marry a man and a so-called pastor joins them in 'holy matrimony'. Friends and relations will attend the ceremony. A woman can also marry a woman. If that is what they mean by separating religion from state, Islam will have none of that. Sharia laws are devine laws which are not subject to human or scientific examination. THOSE WHO HAVE EARS LET THEM HEAR. Masalam. This type of declaration could only have come from those who are ‘ashamed’ of their faith. Or better still, those who are not even believers. Religious or spiritual matters are not ‘subjectable’ to scientific research or enquiry. So, the declarants of that so-called ‘declaration’ are not only ignorant but blatantly mischievious.

In the first place, they (declarants) are a faceless bunch of strange bed-fellows. They call themselves, – BELIEVERS, DOUBTERS AND UNBELIEVERS. No right-thinking individual would take such a group of fellows seriously. It is better for them to take a stand. Let them move away from the centre of the road – it is too dangerious. They should either be (1) ‘believers’, (2) ‘doubters’ or (3) ‘unbelievers’. They cannot belong to the three camps all at the same time. Because they are ambivalent, I am not going to take them seriously. However, let them known that Islam does not encourage/preach honour killing, forced veiling, forced marriage, oppression of women, female circumcission, etc, as alleged. Indeed, Islam practically defend and protect women in a special way. A sura(chapter) is devoted to women. Those who are interested should go a read it for themselves. (SURAT AN-NISA).

They also talked about separation of religion from state. They betrayed their ignorance of the fact that religion gave rise to the state. The very foundation of ‘the state’ is anchored on religion, hence separating them 100% will be near impossible. The western attempt to do so is what has resulted in lesbianism and state sanctioned sodomy. Now, a man can marry a man and a so-called pastor joins them in ‘holy matrimony’. Friends and relations will attend the ceremony. A woman can also marry a woman. If that is what they mean by separating religion from state, Islam will have none of that. Sharia laws are devine laws which are not subject to human or scientific examination. THOSE WHO HAVE EARS LET THEM HEAR. Masalam.

]]> By: Khalid http://www.iqrasense.com/islam-and-media/secular-islam.html#comment-775 Khalid Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:06:35 +0000 http://www.iqrasense.com/islam-and-media/secular-islam.html#comment-775 As Salaamu 'alaikum This is quite clearly a 'declaration of kufr' and only serves to strengthen the 'umbrella of kufr' that prevents the 'rain of Islaam reaching the people. Wa Salaam As Salaamu ‘alaikum

This is quite clearly a ‘declaration of kufr’ and only serves to strengthen the ‘umbrella of kufr’ that prevents the ‘rain of Islaam reaching the people.

Wa Salaam

]]>